|
This is a free sample preview of the essay
R. V. Keilty
Beginning of essay
In the case R.v.Keilty the accused, Keilty, was charged and convicted of
trafficking in narcotics. He then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada on
the grounds that the trial judge erred in law. The facts in the case were not
disputed but the actual definition of possession under section 2 of ....
Middle of essay
.... who operate their business "long distance" to
escape prosecution because they never actually had the narcotics in their
possession.
Appellant arguments
A person should not be stigmatized by conviction for a criminal offense
they did not actually commit.. The case R.v.Vallancourt illustrates the use of
the "stigma" test. A person who is convicted of possession should not be also
branded as a trafficker of narcotics also. Another principle brought to the
court from the R.v.Vallancourt case i.... |
| Number of words: 729 |
Approximate pages: 3 |
|
Need help with writing your essay? Sign up today to view the rest of this paper and get unlimited access to over 45000 other essays just
like it. Some other sites charge you for each essay, but here at EssayPal we give you full access to our entire database for one low subscription
fee. Thousands of other students around the world have realized what an affordable deal this is and have become members. Come see what
you are missing out on. Once you've become a member, you will not go back to the other term paper sites either.
| Length |
Type |
Price |
PayPal |
| 30 days |
recurring |
$19.95 |
| 90 days |
recurring |
$39.95 |
| 180 days |
non-recurring |
$69.95 |
|
|
|
